Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Assignment #12 - Rhetorical Analysis

           The article “Inventing the University”, wrote by David Bartholomae (1986) and published in the Journal of Basic Writing, talks about the challenges that involve being a new writer.  The author’s focus is how the new writers must seem themselves as “authority” toward theirs audience, by writing their essays as they are experts on the issue, and not like a student write for a professor. Moreover, Bartholomae argues that the university and teachers should present the writing for the students not just in “introductory courses”. For those analyses, the author analyzed 500 essays wrotes by “basic writers”.

            Bartholomae evaluate and used some essays as examples to base his arguments. The article talks about how students should evolve written in order to improve the rhetoric surrounding the audience. The author’s purpose is to show a new center of attentions for the new writers, that isn’t based only on the sentence structure, but also in how the writers learn to write for their own, with “effort” and trying something unfamiliar. In the beginning of the article, Bartholomae talks about how students approach their speeches. This introductory part of the articles makes the article seems like a guide for a new writer analyzes his own writing skills. After some paragraphs was possible see that Bartholomae was criticizing the way the writing is presented to students, and through the analysis of the essays, he showed how students can improve their ability to writing at the university. These facts make the audience clear: students (mainly new writers), and especially English’s teachers, since the authors used “we” several times to refer to how teachers must approach new writers. The rhetoric of the article is based in logos, since the author build his arguments in a rational and logical way. Besides, it is possible identify the use of ethos, when the author gives for himself credibility (because he is an English teacher), and also with use of good sources.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Blog Assignment #11

I believe writing, composition, and rhetoric, are fundamental tools for my educational and professional life. My writing skills will be required in many reports and academic papers. I already felt how those skills are important to me during the last five years of my undegraduation in Brazil. My major is civil engineering, thus the rhetoric is more based on logos and ethos, because all my analyses are based on the results that I find, facts, and the study of famous (and most of the time, already dead) physicists, mathematicians, and engineers. On the other hand I can say I already used pathos in an article, in order to show that the material offered by a provider had bad quality (and it have had a huge influence in my test’s results). The argument was based on logic as well, but I knew that my professors and other people interested in the article would consider that it wasn’t my fault at all. The same is for my professional life, because I will need archive a lot of information about my designs or from construction management. Moreover, if I work as an engineering expert, I would need to write reports for judges in cases like the fall of a building, or even a simple claim of a client on any construction problem against a construction company. Therefore, I know I will need to communicate well with people from different fields through writing, in a technical report, in a proposal, or a simple job order, for example.

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Blog#10


- Be able to make the connection between questions and problems in your life both within and outside of college.


I believe this topic was covered in the assignment 3. Anyway, I felt lost in the beginning of the assignment because we didn’t have time to think about our problem, and all class activities were related with the problem.  I understand that most of the students already had a problem, but it wasn’t my case. I needed several days in order to “create” a problem. I don’t believe that I have difficult to see problems about issues; on the contrary, I think I am very critical. I just think I forced the existence of a problem to be able to discuss something for the assignment and create the genres, it makes me feel bad about the topic. I wonder that I know I would need a problem and solution for the assignment 3 when I started the assignment 2, that way I would find a issue that I actually believe to be a problem.