The rhetorical analysis can be understood as a critical investigation of a text, video, or image. Such analysis involves the interaction between the text itself, the author, and the audience, as well as, the information that the reader (or who is analyzing) needs to get from the text. I believe that the Rhetoric Analysis is an indispensable tool for my future writing projects, since it’s strengthens my critical thinking. In the analysis we must always try to understand what is written between the lines, in the other words, what is the intention of the author, or if there is some external factor influencing the author’s opinion. Several answers found by rhetorical analysis can help me to be more persuasive with my own audience, as well as, looking for a more critical thinking when I read any article or any piece of ideas.
In order to analyze an article about my future research (Do social networking sites change people's behavior towards politics?), I have rhetorically analyzed the article
“The Impact of Social Networking Sites on Politics” by Megan Baker, 2009. I couldn’t find information about the author on the Internet, this indicates to me that maybe it is an isolated publication about the issue, and maybe the author isn’t specialist in that, so the credibility still is unknown. Moreover, the article has a lot of data from others sources, which the author used to build her conclusion. While I was reading the article it seems that Baker was trying to be neutral about the topic by bring in some controversial ideas from the sources. However, after read the conclusion, it seems that in the entire article Baker used the sources in order to state her own disagreements about the impact of social webpages on politics, because she basically agreed with all the authors by saying “I do not think that social networking sites will create a "new era of democracy" but I do think that it has helped the candidates reach out to supporters, mostly people who supported them already, but also some who were uncertain in their choice”. She basically summarize the controversial sources that she have used in the text, saying that Internet is not revolutionary while just facilitate the political engagement, but doesn’t confirm that the political discussion will do people really act. Anyway, it is not possible know how the author uses all her sources, if it has reliability or not (since I honestly didn’t read all those sources), but in some way it is possible see that her opinion is completely based on the sources’ opinion.
The terms I have learned from Allyn & Bacon Guide are useful for me to direct my vision for the rhetoric of the author, trying to ignore my opinions on the topic and trying to understand what the author want to respond. I believe the article that I selected is rather simple, and the author information is limited, so I can’t make an analysis of her angle of view. Either way, it is very important to follow techniques of rhetorical analysis, creating a sort of outline for this ranalysis, and ensuring that all aspects are evaluated.